The Fountain Pen Patent Archive

The instruments that put ink under pressure

IMPROVED FOUNTAIN-PEN

1856: a twisted-wire feed and slide-valve, three decades before Waterman

PatentUS 14,276
PatentedFebruary 19, 1856
InventorHenry A. Brown and James Wiley
OfBrooklyn, New York
Patent drawing of an 1856 fountain pen showing six figures: an assembled pen and case, a cutaway with internal piston and rod, separate case sections, and detailed close-ups of the nib and slide-valve mechanism at the pen tip.
Fig. 1 — Perspective view of pen and case; Fig. 2 — Vertical section showing charging piston; Fig. 3 — Section of case before assembly; Fig. 4 — Section of case with piston rod · click to zoom
Sheet 1 of the patentSheet 2 of the patentSheet 3 of the patent

Early self-regulating fountain pen with slide-valve

How it works

The pen shank is concave and fitted with a solid half-circular head that acts as a valve. A twisted wire runs from the valve head to the split nib, carrying ink by capillary action to the point while its twist limits the flow. The pen-holder has a transverse notch forming a valve seat, so sliding the pen in or out of the holder opens or closes the flow of ink from the barrel. A piston and rod in the barrel are used to draw ink into the fountain when the valve is lifted off its seat and the pen is inserted into a bottle of ink.

What was claimed

“The making of the pen A with a solid half-circular head B and arranging it to slide in the pen-holder, (having a face-plate E and e^2, as set forth,) so as to operate as a slide-valve or cut-off to the flow of ink, when operated substantially as hereinbefore set forth, and in form and manner and for the purposes described.”

In plain English: They claim a pen with a solid rounded head that slides within the holder to act as a valve, shutting off or allowing ink flow as needed.

In the inventor’s words

“In all other fountain-pens known to us there is either great complexity of arrangements to effect these results, thereby making it liable to get out of repair, or there is a constant tendency to too great flow of the ink, and thereby causing the paper to blot while writing.”— Henry A. Brown and James Wiley, from the specification

Commentary

Brown and Wiley were working the problem twenty-eight years before Waterman solved it, and their diagnosis was already correct. Their own words nail the era's dilemma: every fountain pen either had "great complexity of arrangements" or "a constant tendency to too great flow of the ink." Their answer has two parts worth separating. The feed is a twisted wire running from the barrel to the split nib — capillary action carries ink down the twist, and the tightness of the twist meters the flow. That is a genuine feed idea, crude but in the right family: use fine channels to ration ink rather than gravity to dump it. The valve is the claimed novelty: the pen shank itself slides in the holder, its rounded head seating against a notch to cut off ink entirely when you push it home.

Look at Fig. 2 and you'll spot the third feature a casual reader misses — a piston and rod inside the barrel. Lift the valve, dip the pen in a bottle, draw the piston, and you've filled the reservoir. That's a self-filling mechanism in 1856, half a century before Conklin's crescent made self-filling a selling point.

What it lacks is the air-exchange insight — Waterman's channels let air in as ink goes out, which is what actually tamed the flow. Without that, the twisted wire would still gush or starve unpredictably. A dead end, but an unusually thoughtful one.

Paper patent — likely never produced

No Brown & Wiley pens are known to collectors, and pre-Waterman valve pens of this complexity rarely reached production; a marked specimen would be a significant find.

This drawing is free. It is a work of the United States government, published February 19, 1856, and has been in the public domain since the day it was printed. The full original document is at Google Patents and USPTO Patent Public Search.