The Fountain Pen Patent Archive

The instruments that put ink under pressure

FOUNTAIN-PEN.

A nib that cannot be put back wrong: foolproofing the feed in 1895

PatentUS 547,355
PatentedOctober 1, 1895
InventorWilliam H. O'Keefe
OfLockport, New York
FiledDecember 15, 1894
Patent drawing of a hard rubber fountain pen shown in full diagonal view with a cutaway section revealing the internal feed-bar, pen-point, and plug-valve, alongside smaller detail views of the triangular feed-bar cross-sections and the pen-point's locking projection.
Fig. 1 — Enlarged sectional view of full pen assembly; Fig. 2 — Detail view of the feed-bar; Fig. 3 — Modification of feed-bar cross-section, triangular; Fig. 3a — Modification of feed-bar with curved sides · click to zoom
Sheet 1 of the patentSheet 2 of the patentSheet 3 of the patent

Fountain pen with fixed feed-bar and pen-point

How it works

A removable slip-section holds a hollow, angular (triangular) feed-bar that channels ink from the barrel reservoir to the pen-point via capillary attraction. The pen-point has a projection that engages a slot in the slip-section, locking the point in fixed relation to the feed-bar to prevent displacement. The feed-bar's beveled, re-entrant angular cross-section creates acute angles that allow ink to flow downward centrally while air simultaneously passes upward along the sides. A plug-valve with an internal hole can be aligned with a recess in the barrel wall to allow filling via rubber suction, then rotated to seal the ink inside.

What was claimed

“In a fountain pen, the combination with a pen holder, and a removable pen section, of an angular feed tube extending on an incline from the pen section to the pen, and a pen held between the holder and pen section and in contact with the outer end of the feed tube, one of said parts, the pen, holder or pen section having a projection and another a hole adapted to receive the projection, said parts arranged to maintain a fixed relation between the outer end of the feed tube and the pen, substantially as set forth.”

In plain English: The pen combines a holder and removable section with an angled feed tube, where a projection-and-hole arrangement locks the pen point in a fixed position relative to the feed tube's tip.

In the inventor’s words

“With my improved construction there is no possibility even of mistake, as their relative position is a fixed one, so that they cannot be returned wrong.”— William H. O'Keefe, from the specification

Commentary

Ten years after Waterman's fissure feed settled the basic physics, the field turned to smaller torments — and one of the most persistent was the user who pulled the nib for cleaning and reseated it crooked. Feed-to-nib alignment is everything in a capillary pen: a hair too far from the slit and it starves, a hair too close and it floods. O'Keefe's answer is a projection punched into the nib itself that drops into a slot in the section, locking nib and feed in one fixed relation. His own words carry the pitch: 'they cannot be returned wrong.' Fig. 5 shows he was hedging on the projection's shape — chevrons, an X, a ring, a squiggle — which suggests he knew the claim mattered more than the stamping.

The feed is the quieter half of the patent and arguably the better one. The Figs. 3 through 3b cross-sections show a hollow triangular bar with re-entrant angles, the idea being that ink descends the acute central channel while air climbs the flanks — the standard Waterman-era exchange problem, solved geometrically rather than with sawn fissures. The plug-valve filler, rotated open for suction filling, is a period-typical afterthought.

The irony is that keyed nibs never caught on; the industry solved the alignment problem with friction fit and, later, by telling users not to disassemble their pens at all. A thoughtful entry chasing a real annoyance down a path the trade declined to follow.

Paper patent — likely never produced

No maker is known to have produced pens with slotted, keyed nibs to this design, and stamping a locating projection into a gold nib would have complicated a standardized component; no marked example is documented.

This drawing is free. It is a work of the United States government, published October 1, 1895, and has been in the public domain since the day it was printed. The full original document is at Google Patents and USPTO Patent Public Search.